As of October 31, 2013, the Project on Commercializing Innovation is no longer active.
The Project is succeeded by the Hoover IP² Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Prosperity. Hoover IP²

Chapter Four – Novelty and Loss of Right

Chapter four introduces the concepts of anticipation by prior art and loss of right, which are both defined in 35 U.S.C. § 102.  Although § 102 may seem complex at first glance, each of its sub-sections may be considered separately when analyzing a problem.  By carefully stepping through the who, what, when, and where of § 102, any problem can be made manageable.  Understanding the prior art identified by the § 102 analysis is vital even if no anticipation or loss of right is found.  As you will see in chapter five, much of the same prior art is used to conduct the obviousness analysis of § 103.
The Sixth Edition covers both the pre-AIA version of § 102 and the current version, now in force.  Because the old version will still apply to hundreds of thousands of patents and patent applications filed before that part of the AIA became effective, we encourage professors and students to cover both versions in detail.
Note the Reexamination Certificate at the end of the Paulsen ‘456 patent and the Notice of Adverse Decisions in Interference at the end of the Dynamic Sciences Limited ‘662 patent, which show the final outcomes of their respective cases.
Students studying prior art issues may be interested in this set of prior art problems and answers prepared by Professors Paul M. Janicke and Lisa A. Dolak.  The questions and answers focus on prior art issues under the America Invents Act and may be useful as a study aid.
Additional Source Material